-
آرشیو :
نسخه تابستان 1398 - جلد دوم
-
نوع مقاله :
پژوهشی
-
کد پذیرش :
12637
-
موضوع :
حقوق بین الملل
-
نویسنده/گان :
بهمن بهری خیاوی، علیرضا پاکنژاد
-
کلید واژه :
معاهده مودت 1955، دیوان بین المللی دادگستری، قرار موقت، برجام، تحریم
-
Title :
Analyzing the content of the issue provisional measure order for the International Court of Justice on the Alleged violations of the 1955 treaty of amity, economic relations, and consular rights (islamic republic of iran v. united states of america)
-
Abstract :
Along with the withdrawal of United States of America from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and imposing a number of sanctions on the Islamic Republic of Iran, a petition against the United States of America was filed on July 16, 2018 in accordance with the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights of 1955 between Iran and the United States of America, and at the same time, a request for provisional measure was provided by the court due to the destructive and unjustifiable effects of the sanctions. After hearing the petitions and defense of the parties on October 3, 2018, the court decided to issue provisional measure and simultaneously to authenticate its eligibility, and considered the imposition of the US sanctions contrary to the treaty of Amity of 1955. To do this, the court called for cancellation of sanctions related to medicines, medical supplies, alimentary and agricultural items, aircraft parts and equipment as well as required maintenance services for airline safety. Further, the court requested a guarantee by the US side to submit a license for importing and money transfers regarding the mentioned issues and at the end, both parties were demanded to refrain from any action to aggravate or expand the dispute. In this study, we first present briefly the definition of provisional measure and the dictum issued by the court in the case of the Treaty of Amity violation as well as the economic relation and the consular rights of 1955 between Iran and the United States of America will be studied and analyzed.
-
key words :
Treaty of Amity of 1955, International Court of Justice, provisional measure, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, sanction
-
مراجع :
[1] ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا، همکاران (1397)، آرا و نظریات مشورتی دیوان بین المللی دادگستری، جلد1 تا5.،تهران: علامه طباطبایی.
[2] میرعباسی، سیدباقر؛ سادات میدانی، سیدحسین(1396)، دادرسی های بین المللی دیوان بین المللی دادگستری در تئوری و عمل، جلد اول، تهران: جنگل.
[3] جلالی، محمود (پاییز 1382)، "حقوق بشر در تصمیمات دیوان بین المللی دادگستری"، حقوقی دادگستری، شماره 44، صص 33-54
[4] زمانی، سیدقاسم، غریب ابادی، کاظم(بهار 1396)، "تحریم به مثابه تعهدات بین المللی دولت ها در زمینه حمایت از حقوق بشر"، حقوق پزشکی، شماره 40، صص 113-135
[5] صفایی، سیدحسین (زمستان 1392)؛ دادرس، پیمان، "ماهیت الزام اور یا غیرالزام آور اقدامات تامینی صادره توسط دیوان بین المللی دادگستری"، مطالعات حقوقی، دوره پنجم، شماره 4، صص 141-160
[6] صدیق، محسن (1386)، "ابعاد حقوقی قرارهای موقت در اسناد و رویه دیوان بین المللی دادگستری"، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
[7] فرزانه، یوسف،(1375) "قرارهای تامینی در رویه دیوان بین المللی دادگستری"، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
[8] Bhattacharya, shouvik, (2013), “Proceeding at Your Own Risk”: Evaluating a New Principle of International Law for Provisional Measures, the yale journal of international law,vol.38, pp:511-524
[9] Jochen Abr. Frowein, (2012), " Provisional measures by the International Court of Justice - the LaGrand Case", Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol.62,pp:55-60
[10] Kampen, bernhard, (2009), "The Practice of the International Court of Justice on Provisional Measures: The Recent Development", Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, ZaöRV 69 ,PP: 919-929
[11] Zyberi, gentian, (2010), "Provisional Measures of the International Court of Justice in Armed Conflict Situations", Leiden Journal of International Law, 23, pp: 571-584
[12] قانون آئین دادرسی دادگاههای عمومی و انقلاب ( در امور مدنی) تاریخ تصویب : 21/01/1379
[13] I.C.J. Reports order 3 october 2018, Alleged violations of the 1955 treaty of amity, economic relations, and consular rights (islamic republic of iran v. united states of america).
[14] Application instituting proceedings (16 July 2018), available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/175/175-20180716-APP-01-00-EN.pdf
[15] I.C.J. Reports Order of 23 July 2018, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates), Provisional Measures,
[16] I.C.J. Reports Order of 19 april 2017, Provisional Measures, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation).
[17] i.c.j. reports order of 5 february 2003, avena and other mexican nationals (mexico v. united states of america),
[18] I.C.J. Reports 1949, Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania),
[19] international Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966
[20] I.C.J. Reports 1950, Advisory Opinion, First Phase,Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, (Hungary and Romania).
[21] International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, A/RES/20/2106, (21 december 1965)
[22] I.C.J. Reports Order of 7 December 2016, Provisional Measures, Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial Guinea v. France)
[23] joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Vienna, 14 July 2015, available at: http://undocs.org/S/2015/544
[24] LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2001
[25] I.C.J. reports order of 10 may 1984, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America).
[26] i.c.j. reports 27 june 1986, , judgment, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)
[27] i.c.j. Reports 6 november 2003, , judgment, Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)
[28] I.C.J. Reports ORDER OF 28 MAY 2009,Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal).
[29] I.C.J. Reports Order of 3 March 2014, Provisional Measures, Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia).
[30] Request for the indication of provisional measures (16 July 2018), available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/175/175-20180716-REQ-01-00-EN.pdf
[31] I.C.J. Reports order of 18 july 2011, Request for interpretation of the judgment of 15 june 1962 in the case concerning the temple of preah vihear(cambodia v. Thailand)(CAMBODIA v. THAILAND),
[32] Security Council, Resolution 2231 (2015), available at: http://www.un.org/en/sc/2231/
[33] The statute of international court of justice
[34] Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights. Signed at Tehran, on 15 August 1955, available at: https://treaties.un.org/pages/showdetails.aspx?objid=0800000280142196
[35] Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948
- صفحات : 102-113
-
دانلود فایل
( 449.19 KB )
